How To Write A Winning PEP Grant 1

How To Write A Winning PEP Grant

Background: Since 2001, dramatic changes took place in academic institutions across the USA due to a recent initiative made to radically transform and reward college districts and areas attempting to change. These recognizable changes in programming, curriculum, and equipment are a part of the nation’s response to the dramatic upsurge in Type II diabetes currently found in our kids and youth. According to Dr. Cynthia Ogden, scientific researcher with the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), around 31% of adults are obese and 15% of children and teenagers age group 6-19 are overweight.

While Dr. Ogden observed that overweight and obesity are a problem for many individuals in the country, it is a major factor for increased center attacks, stroke, hypertension, and certain types of cancers. Just, what exactly is PEP Grants? 1.5 million can be granted through the PEP Grant Program. Additionally, grant recipients must implement programs that help students make improvement toward meeting any required condition physical education standards. For example, Shadyside Local Schools is now in its second season of applying a PEP grant.

  • No starchy foods like rice, breads, and pasta
  • Cysts or gallstones, which can obstruct the bile duct
  • Make sure you choose one with an array of exercises
  • FREE Polar BodyAge Assessment with an avowed Fitness Specialist

I recently acquired the opportunity to visit this college district and to talk with Holly King, the physical education teacher who was behind the grant writing work. She offers these five tips for schools thinking about learning how to effectively write a PEP Grant. 1: Provide Key Baseline Data and Student Buy-In – For example, numerous meetings were held to clarify the scope and purpose of the grant with all interested parties constantly involved.

This created additional data for the necessity of the project and a continuous “churning of ideas” to involve like-minded agencies, organizations, and folks in the project. As a total result, students such as Kelsey Holloway proven the type of “readiness” the give reviewers needed to see in Shadyside’s software. 2: Do not get Discouraged – Trying to get the Carol M. White Physical Education for Progress (PEP) offer was a rather “long street” says King. She advises other potential PEP grant applicants to persevere, to reapply for the grant, and seek the help of a specialist grant writer, when possible.

3: Search the net – There are a large variety of great grant resources on the net, specifically for the PEP Grant. Just performing a web search on “2010-PEP Grants” or “Carol M White PEP Grants” will provide you with samples of funded grant activities, companies that offer free grant writing services, and actual copies of winning PEP Grants. Unfortunately, this offer has historically only provided six weeks between your announcement and the deadline. For this good reason, most winning grant applications result from those school districts who have submitted before and have used the grant reviewers’ comments to strengthen their application.

Second, the dependence on low costs and low power leads most wireless sensor nodes to have low-power microcontrollers ensuring that mechanisms such as virtual memory are either unneeded or too expensive to implement. It is therefore possible to use inserted operating systems such as uC/OS or eCos for sensor systems. However, such os’s are often made with real-time properties.

TinyOS could very well be the first operating system specifically made for wireless sensor networks. TinyOS is based on an event-driven programming model rather than multithreading. TinyOS programs are composed of event jobs and handlers with run-to-completion semantics. When an external event occurs, such as an incoming data packet or a sensor reading, TinyOS signals the appropriate event handler to handle the event.